Collins v. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. et al

Filing 75

ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 64 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and APPROVED, and pltf's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/28/11. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(rd)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
JIMMY L. COLLINS, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC
REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC.,
MERSCORP., collectively as MERS,
WILSON & ASSOCIATES, PLLC,
SHELLIE WALLACE, Trustee, and
CITIMORTGAGE, INC.,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:11-0264
Judge Sharp
Magistrate Judge Knowles

ORDER
On June 13, 2011, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (“R &
R”) (Docket Entry No. 64), recommending that Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment
(Docket Entry No. 27) be denied because Plaintiff did not comply with Local Rule 56.01(b).
Despite being specifically advised in the R & R that any objections to the recommended
disposition needed to be filed within fourteen days, Plaintiff filed no objections.
Having conducted a de novo review of the matter in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P.
72(b), the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s recommendations. Accordingly,
(1) The R & R (Docket Entry No. 64) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; and
(2) Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket Entry No. 27) is hereby DENIED
because Plaintiff failed comply with Local Rule 56.01(b).
It is SO ORDERED.

_________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE