Jimenez et al v. Vanderbilt Landscaping LLC et al

Filing 68

ORDER: The Objections of the Vanderbilt Defendants are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Vanderbilt Defendants' Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim 53 is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/29/12. (tmw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

HILARIO RAZURA JIMENEZ, et al.
v.
VANDERBILT LANDSCAPING, LLC,
et al.

)
)
) NO. 3-11-0276
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
)

ORDER
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 62), Objections filed by the Vanderbilt Defendants/Counter-Claimants1 (Docket No. 63), and
Plaintiffs’ Response to those Objections (Docket No. 67).
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the
Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The
Objections of the Vanderbilt Defendants are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is
adopted and approved.
Accordingly, the Vanderbilt Defendants’ Motion for Leave to Amend Counterclaim (Docket
No. 53) is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.

___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1

Defendants Vanderbilt Landscaping, LLC, Larry Vanderbilt, Sr. and Joffery Vanderbilt.