Thompson v. City of Lebanon, Tennessee et al
Filing
307
Order: Defendants' Motion in Limine 279 and Motion in Limine 283 are DENIED as moot. All other pending Motions in this case are DENIED without prejudice to be re-filed after conclusion of the pending appeal. The Clerk shall close this cas e administratively until the pending appeal is concluded. The parties shall promptly notify the Court of the result of the appeal. The case may be reopened upon Motion from either party at that time. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 6/30/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(ds)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
MELINDA THOMPSON
v.
CITY OF LEBANON, TENNESSEE,
et al.
)
)
) NO. 3-11-0392
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court, among other things, is Plaintiff’s Motion for an Order Certifying
any Interlocutory Appeal as Frivolous (Docket No. 299). Defendants have filed a Response in
opposition to this Motion (Docket No. 301). After review of the pleadings and the relevant case law,
the Court finds that Plaintiff’s Motion should be DENIED. Dickerson v. McClellan, 37 F.3d 251,
252 (6th Cir. 1994); Offineer v. Kelly, 2011 WL 736397 at * 1 (S.D. Ohio Feb. 23, 2011).
The parties have represented that two of the pending Motions in this case are no longer
necessary. Therefore, Defendants’ Motion in Limine # 1 (Docket No. 279) and Defendants’ Motion
in Limine # 2 (Docket No. 283) are DENIED as moot. All other pending Motions in this case are
DENIED without prejudice to being re-filed after conclusion of the pending appeal.
The Clerk shall close this case administratively until the pending appeal is concluded. The
parties shall promptly notify the Court of the result of the appeal. The case may be reopened upon
Motion from either party at that time.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?