Estate of Miguel Robles et al v. Vanderbilt University Medical Center et al

Filing 59

ORDER: Telephone Conference held on 1/9/2013, at which time plaintiffs' counsel addressed four discovery issues related to the defendants' responses to the plaintiffs' interrogatories. Counsel for the parties shall confer with each oth er on those issues and determine if they can reach a resolution on all or some of the issues. If not, counsel may schedule another conference call with the Court and/or the plaintiffs may file a motion to compel. If the parties are not able to take t he depositions of the defendants and Dr. Guy by the 3/1/2013, deadline, they shall attempt to agree to a extension and, if unable to agree, counsel shall schedule a call with the Court to address any necessary extensions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 1/9/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ESTATE OF MIGUEL ROBLES by
Maria Montiel as next of kin and
surviving spouse of Miguel Robles; and
MARIA MONTIEL
v.
VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY
MEDICAL CENTER; TEJAL
BRAHMBHATT, M.D.; LAUREN
HUBBARD ADCOCK, R.N.; and
MICHAEL FISCHER, R.R.T.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3-11-0399

ORDER
Pursuant to the order entered December 18, 2012 (Docket Entry No. 58), counsel for the
parties called the Court on January 9, 2013, at which time plaintiffs' counsel addressed four
discovery issues related to the defendants' responses to the plaintiffs' interrogatories.
Counsel for the parties shall confer with each other on those issues and determine if they can
reach a resolution on all or some of the issues. If not, counsel may schedule another conference call
with the Court and/or the plaintiffs may file a motion to compel.
Counsel shall also confer with each other and schedule the remaining depositions as soon as
possible. If the parties are not able to take the depositions of the defendants and Dr. Guy by the
March 1, 2013, deadline, they shall attempt to agree to a extension and, if unable to agree, counsel
shall schedule a call with the Court to address any necessary extensions. If the parties are able to
agree upon any extended deadlines, they shall file a joint motion to that effect.
As a housekeeping matter, the Clerk is directed to enter John W. Chandler, Jr. as counsel for
the plaintiffs pursuant to his notice of appearance (Docket Entry No. 57), with an email address of
[e-mail], and with the same address, telephone number, and fax number already
listed on the docket for Morgan G. Adams.
It is so ORDERED.
JULIET GRIFFIN
United States Magistrate Judge