Meyer v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.
Filing
15
ORDER: Telephone Conference held on 1/18/2012. The parties advised that they will be scheduling private mediation in this matter. The parties are directed to complete these necessary Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on or before 3/15/2012. The present sche duling order 11 is amended to provide that all discovery will close by 4/6/2012. Dispositive motions will be due 4/27/2012. The final pretrial conference and trial dates set by Judge Nixon will remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/19/12. (dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CHARLES MICHAEL MEYER,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
SMITH & NEPHEW, INC.,
Defendant
No. 3:11-0402
Judge Nixon/Brown
Bench Trial
O R D E R
A telephone conference was held with the parties in this
matter on January 18, 2012.
The parties advised that they will be
scheduling private mediation in this matter.
The parties discussed with the Magistrate Judge the
scheduling
of
a
Rule
30(b)(6)
witness,
or
witnesses
of
the
Defendant, concerning the decision to eliminate the Plaintiff’s
position and the decision either not to rehire or to eliminate the
possibility of a new position.
The parties are directed to
complete these necessary Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on or before
March 15, 2012.
The present scheduling order (Docket Entry 11) is amended
to provide that all discovery will close by April 6, 2012.
Dispositive motions will be due April 27, 2012.
Responses will be
due 21 days thereafter and replies, if any, limited to five pages,
will be due seven days after any response.
are
filed
early,
the
response
and
If dispositive motions
reply
dates
are
moved
up
accordingly.
The final pretrial conference and trial dates set by
Judge Nixon will remain unchanged.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/ Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?