Meyer v. Smith & Nephew, Inc.

Filing 15

ORDER: Telephone Conference held on 1/18/2012. The parties advised that they will be scheduling private mediation in this matter. The parties are directed to complete these necessary Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on or before 3/15/2012. The present sche duling order 11 is amended to provide that all discovery will close by 4/6/2012. Dispositive motions will be due 4/27/2012. The final pretrial conference and trial dates set by Judge Nixon will remain unchanged. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 1/19/12. (dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CHARLES MICHAEL MEYER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff v. SMITH & NEPHEW, INC., Defendant No. 3:11-0402 Judge Nixon/Brown Bench Trial O R D E R A telephone conference was held with the parties in this matter on January 18, 2012. The parties advised that they will be scheduling private mediation in this matter. The parties discussed with the Magistrate Judge the scheduling of a Rule 30(b)(6) witness, or witnesses of the Defendant, concerning the decision to eliminate the Plaintiff’s position and the decision either not to rehire or to eliminate the possibility of a new position. The parties are directed to complete these necessary Rule 30(b)(6) depositions on or before March 15, 2012. The present scheduling order (Docket Entry 11) is amended to provide that all discovery will close by April 6, 2012. Dispositive motions will be due April 27, 2012. Responses will be due 21 days thereafter and replies, if any, limited to five pages, will be due seven days after any response. are filed early, the response and If dispositive motions reply dates are moved up accordingly. The final pretrial conference and trial dates set by Judge Nixon will remain unchanged. It is so ORDERED. /s/ Joe B. Brown JOE B. BROWN United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?