USA v. Meridian Surgical Partners, LLC

Filing 89

ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff-Relator's Motion to Adjourn Pending Deadlines and Continue the Trial Date (Docket No. 84 ). Plaintiff-Relator actually seeks to extend, not adjourn, the pending deadlines. Whether the trial is con tinued depends upon the Magistrate Judge's ruling on extending the other pending deadlines. Therefore, this Motion is referred to the Magistrate Judge, who shall consider it and Defendant's Response (Docket No. 87 ) and make any needed a djustments in the pending deadlines. The jury trial of this action remains set for May 6, 2014, and the pretrial conference remains set for April 28, 2014, unless and until the Magistrate Judge recommends that they be continued. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/19/13. (la)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ex rel. THOMAS REED SIMMONS v. MERIDIAN SURGICAL PARTNERS, LLC, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0439 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ) ) ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff-Relator’s Motion to Adjourn Pending Deadlines and Continue the Trial Date (Docket No. 84). Plaintiff-Relator actually seeks to extend, not adjourn, the pending deadlines. Whether the trial is continued depends upon the Magistrate Judge’s ruling on extending the other pending deadlines. Therefore, this Motion is referred to the Magistrate Judge, who shall consider it and Defendant’s Response (Docket No. 87) and make any needed adjustments in the pending deadlines. The jury trial of this action remains set for May 6, 2014, and the pretrial conference remains set for April 28, 2014, unless and until the Magistrate Judge recommends that they be continued. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?