USA v. Community Health Systems, Inc.

Filing 104

REVISED ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/6/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. JAMES DOGHRAMJI; SHEREE COOK; and RACHEL BRYANT, ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) ) COMMUNITY HEALTH SYSTEMS, INC., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) CIVIL NO. 3:11-cv-0442 JUDGE SHARP MAGISTRATE JUDGE GRIFFIN ORDER OF DISMISSAL The United States, having intervened in part in this action for the purpose of effectuating the settlement agreement (“the Settlement Agreement”) between the United States, all defendants, and relators James Doghramji, Sheree Cook and Rachel Bryant (“Relators”), pursuant to the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. 3730(b)(2) and (4), and the United States and Relator having filed a Joint Notice of Dismissal pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A), IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Consistent with the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the False Claims Act claims asserted by Relators in this action on behalf of the United States against all defendants for the Covered Conduct as defined in the Settlement Agreement attached as Exhibit A to Docket Entry No. 75, are dismissed with prejudice; 2. Except for Relator’s claims for statutory attorneys’ fees and costs under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d), the remaining False Claims Act claims asserted by Relator against all defendants are dismissed with prejudice to Relator and without prejudice to the United States; and 3. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the United States, all defendants, and Relator to the extent necessary to enforce the terms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement, and to adjudicate Relator’s claims for statutory attorneys’ fees and costs pursuant to 31 U.S.C. § 3730(d). IT IS SO ORDERED, this ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?