Chapman v. Bank of America et al

Filing 22

ORDE: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 6 is Denied. The Court hereby orders the parties to participate in alternative dispute resolution, pursuant to Rules 16.02 - 16.08 of the Local Rules of Court. The Magistrate Judge shall issue all necessaryorders to implement the type of alternative dispute resolution he selects as appropriate. Signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/23/11. (dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GARY W. CHAPMAN v. BANK OF AMERICA, et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0504 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant Bank of America’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is DENIED. The Court hereby orders the parties to participate in alternative dispute resolution, pursuant to Rules 16.02 - 16.08 of the Local Rules of Court. The Magistrate Judge shall issue all necessary orders to implement the type of alternative dispute resolution he selects as appropriate. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?