Whitaker v. Gates
Filing
33
ORDER: A telephone conference was held with the parties to discuss scheduling issues. Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Senior Judge John T. Nixon., Jury Trial set for 9/17/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Se nior Judge John T. Nixon. Discovery may remain open until 1/31/2013. Dispositive Motions will be due on or before 3/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/26/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) Modified on 9/26/2012 (afs).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
NANCY WHITAKER,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
LEON E. PANETTA,
SECRETARY OF DEFENSE,
Defendant
No. 3:11-0522
Judge Nixon/Brown
Jury Demand
O R D E R
A telephone conference was held with the parties to
discuss scheduling issues. Although Plaintiff’s counsel is late in
responding to the first set of discovery requests the Magistrate
Judge will not deem them admitted.
that
the
attorneys
did
not
Part of the problem clearly is
talk
to
each
other
directly
and
communications from their various assistants were not passed up to
them timely.
The Magistrate Judge strongly recommends that the
attorneys talk directly to each other about problems and not allow
them to reach the magnitude of this one.
Plaintiff advised that
she would be sending her responses today.
The Government expects to receive a disc containing
various discovery materials, which will be promptly provided to the
Plaintiff.
material
Plaintiff advised that she would have to have this
printed
out,
depositions are needed.
review
it,
then
see
what
additional
Plaintiff’s counsel advised that there
were some depositions of witnesses from Korea and Virginia, among
other locations.
Plaintiff’s counsel should provide the name of
these witnesses as soon as practicable.
The parties are strongly
encouraged to take out-of-town depositions by telephone, video
conferencing, or other electronic means.
Counsel for the Government advised that they normally
needed 30 days to arrange depositions of teachers to allow for
appropriate schedule adjustments. The Magistrate Judge is concerned
that costs in this matter seem to be rapidly increasing.
Because of these delays, discovery in this matter may
remain open until
January 31, 2013. The deadline for expert
witnesses has passed and neither party has advised they anticipate
experts. The Magistrate Judge will therefore not reopen expert
disclosure and there will be no experts in this case.
Dispositive motions will be due on or before March 15,
2013.
Responses
thereafter.
to
dispositive
motions
will
be
due
21
days
Briefs shall not exceed 25 pages. Optional replies,
limited to five pages, will be due seven days after service of the
response. If dispositive motions are filed early, the response and
reply dates are moved up accordingly.
After consulting with Judge Nixon’s chambers, the final
pretrial conference and trial dates set in Docket Entry 16 are
CANCELED. The parties estimate that this jury trial will take three
days, depending on what issues remain for trial.
After consulting
with Judge Nixon’s courtroom deputy, this matter is reset for trial
on September 17, 2013, at 9:00 a.m.
2
Judge Nixon will conduct the
final pretrial conference on September 6, 2013, at 10:00 a.m.
Judge Nixon will issue a separate order covering his requirements
for the final pretrial conference and the trial.
Given
the
cost
and
complexity
of
this
case,
the
Magistrate Judge strongly recommends that the parties exchange
realistic settlement offers and consider requesting a settlement
conference if they believe that there is a reasonable possibility
of settlement in this case.
The Magistrate Judge stands ready to
assist in this endeavor at the parties’ request at any time.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/ Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?