Whitaker v. Gates

Filing 33

ORDER: A telephone conference was held with the parties to discuss scheduling issues. Pretrial Conference set for 9/6/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Senior Judge John T. Nixon., Jury Trial set for 9/17/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 774 before Se nior Judge John T. Nixon. Discovery may remain open until 1/31/2013. Dispositive Motions will be due on or before 3/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 9/26/12. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(afs) Modified on 9/26/2012 (afs).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION NANCY WHITAKER, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff v. LEON E. PANETTA, SECRETARY OF DEFENSE, Defendant No. 3:11-0522 Judge Nixon/Brown Jury Demand O R D E R A telephone conference was held with the parties to discuss scheduling issues. Although Plaintiff’s counsel is late in responding to the first set of discovery requests the Magistrate Judge will not deem them admitted. that the attorneys did not Part of the problem clearly is talk to each other directly and communications from their various assistants were not passed up to them timely. The Magistrate Judge strongly recommends that the attorneys talk directly to each other about problems and not allow them to reach the magnitude of this one. Plaintiff advised that she would be sending her responses today. The Government expects to receive a disc containing various discovery materials, which will be promptly provided to the Plaintiff. material Plaintiff advised that she would have to have this printed out, depositions are needed. review it, then see what additional Plaintiff’s counsel advised that there were some depositions of witnesses from Korea and Virginia, among other locations. Plaintiff’s counsel should provide the name of these witnesses as soon as practicable. The parties are strongly encouraged to take out-of-town depositions by telephone, video conferencing, or other electronic means. Counsel for the Government advised that they normally needed 30 days to arrange depositions of teachers to allow for appropriate schedule adjustments. The Magistrate Judge is concerned that costs in this matter seem to be rapidly increasing. Because of these delays, discovery in this matter may remain open until January 31, 2013. The deadline for expert witnesses has passed and neither party has advised they anticipate experts. The Magistrate Judge will therefore not reopen expert disclosure and there will be no experts in this case. Dispositive motions will be due on or before March 15, 2013. Responses thereafter. to dispositive motions will be due 21 days Briefs shall not exceed 25 pages. Optional replies, limited to five pages, will be due seven days after service of the response. If dispositive motions are filed early, the response and reply dates are moved up accordingly. After consulting with Judge Nixon’s chambers, the final pretrial conference and trial dates set in Docket Entry 16 are CANCELED. The parties estimate that this jury trial will take three days, depending on what issues remain for trial. After consulting with Judge Nixon’s courtroom deputy, this matter is reset for trial on September 17, 2013, at 9:00 a.m. 2 Judge Nixon will conduct the final pretrial conference on September 6, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. Judge Nixon will issue a separate order covering his requirements for the final pretrial conference and the trial. Given the cost and complexity of this case, the Magistrate Judge strongly recommends that the parties exchange realistic settlement offers and consider requesting a settlement conference if they believe that there is a reasonable possibility of settlement in this case. The Magistrate Judge stands ready to assist in this endeavor at the parties’ request at any time. It is so ORDERED. /s/ Joe B. Brown JOE B. BROWN United States Magistrate Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?