Pigott v. Battle Ground Academy et al

Filing 30

ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Defendants Battle Ground Academy and John W. Griffith's Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 13) is GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows: 1) Summary Judgment is G RANTED in favor of Defendant Griffith on Plaintiff's claims arising under Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-21-301(2). 2) Summary Judgment is DENIED on all other claims. 3) Plaintiff's common-law retaliatory discharge claim is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further case management. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 11/15/12. (af)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
AMY C. PIGOTT,
Plaintiff,
v.
BATTLE GROUND ACADEMY
and JOHN W. GRIFFITH,
Defendants.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:11-cv-00764
Judge Sharp

ORDER
For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum of Law, Defendants Battle
Ground Academy and John W. Griffith’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 13) is
GRANTED IN PART and DENIED IN PART, as follows:
1)

Summary Judgment is GRANTED in favor of Defendant Griffith on Plaintiff’s
claims arising under Tenn. Code Ann. § 4-21-301(2).

2)

Summary Judgment is DENIED on all other claims.

3)

Plaintiff’s common-law retaliatory discharge claim is DISMISSED WITH
PREJUDICE.

This case is returned to the Magistrate Judge for further case management.
It is so ORDERED.

_________________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

1