Dixon v. West Nashville Wrecker Service et al
Filing
46
ORDER ADOPTING 43 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS re 40 Motion for Summary Judgment filed by United Road Towing, West Nashville Wrecker Service. The R & R (Docket No. 43 ) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED. Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40 ) is hereby GRANTED. This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58. It is SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 12/6/2012.(xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ANTONIO D. DIXON,
Plaintiff
v.
WEST NASHVILLE WRECKER
SERVICE and UNITED ROAD
TOWING, INC.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:11-0784
Judge Sharp
ORDER
The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No. 43)
recommending that Defendants’ unopposed Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 43) be
granted, and that this case be dismissed with prejudice. Despite being specifically advised in the R
& R that failure to file objections within fourteen days of receipt could “constitute a waiver of
further appeal,” (Docket No. 43 at 8), Plaintiff has filed no objections.
Having considered the matter de novo in accordance with Rule 72 of the Federal Rules of
Civil Procedure, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge that Defendants have advanced
legitimate reasons for its employment actions, including its decision to terminate Plaintiff for
insubordination and refusing work assignments. Plaintiff has wholly failed to present any evidence
which would suggest that those reasons were pretextual.
Accordingly, the Court rules as follows:
(1) The R & R (Docket No. 43) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED;
(2) Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 40) is hereby GRANTED;
1
(3) This case is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
The Clerk is directed to enter Judgment in a separate document in accordance with Federal
Rule of Civil Procedure 58.
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?