Burgess v. Affiliated Computer Services, Inc.

Filing 31

ORDER: On January 13, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation 30 , to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the Defendant's Motion to Dismiss 14 is DENIED, and the Plaintiff's Motion to Amend 16 is GRANTED. This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the original referral Order. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 2/2/12. (xc:Pro se party via NEF.)(tmw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
SHAWNELLIAS BURGESS,
Plaintiff,
v.
AFFILIATED COMPUTER SERVICES, INC.,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Civil No. 3:11-0927
Judge Trauger
Magistrate Judge Brown

ORDER
On January 13, 2012, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation
(Docket No. 30), to which no timely objections have been filed. The Report and
Recommendation is therefore ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law
of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, the Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No.
14) is DENIED, and the Plaintiff’s Motion to Amend (Docket No. 16) is GRANTED.
This case is REFERRED back to the Magistrate Judge for further handling under the
original referral Order.
It is so ORDERED.
Enter this 2nd day of February 2012.

________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge