Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. et al

Filing 202

ORDER: Lead Plaintiffs' opposition to U.S. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than March 10, 2014. Moving U.S. Defendants shall file reply memoranda, if any, in support of theirpending Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint no later than April10, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 2/21/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION ) ) LAWRENCE BLITZ, Individually and on ) Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) ) AGFEED INDUSTRIES, INC., JOHN A. STADLER, GERARD DAIGNAULT, CLAY ) ) MARSHALL, EDWARD PAZDRO, IVAN ) GOTHNER, FREDERIC RITTEREISER, ) ARNOLD STALOFF, SONGYAN LI, SELINA JIN, LIANGFAN YAN, JUNHONG ) ) XIONG, GOLDMAN KURLAND & ) MOHIDIN, LLP, AND McGLADREY & ) PULLEN LLP ) Defendants. No. 3:11-cv-0992 CONSOLIDATED CLASS ACTION Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles ORDER THIS MATTER having come before the Court by stipulation of the parties, and through counsel for Lead Plaintiffs William McCaffery, Ginger-Haubeck McCaffery, Joseph Boccuti, Larry Ewing and Stephen Arseneault (“Lead Plaintiffs”), along with Defendants John A. Stadler, Gerard Daignault, Clay Marshall, Edward Pazdro, Arnold Staloff, Frederic Rittereiser, and Ivan Gothner (“U.S. Defendants”) (collectively “Movants”), IT IS ORDERED THAT: 1. Lead Plaintiffs’ opposition to U.S. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be filed no later than March 10, 2014; and 2. Moving U.S. Defendants shall file reply memoranda, if any, in support of their pending Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint no later than April 10, 2014. 1 SO ORDERED: __________________________________ E. Clifton Knowles United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?