Blitz v. AgFeed Industries, Inc. et al

Filing 228

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 222 ), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the fil e. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP (Docket No. 186) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs' claims against Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP are DISMISSED.The remaining claims are the subject of a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, which will be heard in this Court on October 2, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 9/25/14. (afs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION LAWRENCE BLITZ, et al. v. AGFEED INDUSTRIES, INC., et al. ) ) ) NO. 3-11-0992 (Lead case) ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 222), to which no Objections have been filed. The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and the file. The Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, the Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP (Docket No. 186) is GRANTED, and Plaintiffs’ claims against Defendant Goldman Kurland & Modhidin, LLP are DISMISSED. The remaining claims are the subject of a Motion for Preliminary Approval of Class Action Settlement, which will be heard in this Court on October 2, 2014. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?