Huffnagle et al v. Loiacono
Filing
40
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 7/31/12. (SEE ORDER FOR OTHER DETAILS) (dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
JAMES HUFFNAGLE, JAMES HEARN
)
REINHOLD HOLTKAMP,
)
WILLIAM HEMRICK, MELVIN W. MARTIN, )
HOWARD LUARTES, individually, and in his )
Capacity as Member and Director, on behalf of )
TEA PARTY HD, LLC,
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
)
v.
)
)
ANTHONY LOIACONO, individually and
)
d/b/a HEADS & TAILS, INC., a suspended
)
California Corporation,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No.: 3:11-cv-01009
JURY DEMAND
CONFIDENTIALITY ORDER
WHEREAS, the parties to this Consent Confidentiality Order (“parties”), have stipulated
that certain discovery material is and should be treated as confidential, and have agreed to the
31st
terms of this Order; accordingly, it is this ______ day of July, 2012, ORDERED that:
1.
Confidential documents shall be so designated by placing or affixing the word
“CONFIDENTIAL” on the document in a manner which will not interfere with the legibility of
the document and which will permit complete removal of the CONFIDENTIAL designation.
Documents shall be designated CONFIDENTIAL prior to, or contemporaneously with, the
production or disclosure of the documents. Inadvertent or unintentional production of documents
without prior designation as CONFIDENTIAL shall not be deemed a waiver, in whole or in part,
of the right to designate documents as CONFIDENTIAL as otherwise allowed by this Order.
2.
Any party may designate documents as CONFIDENTIAL, but only after review
of the documents by an attorney who has, in good faith, certified that the documents contain
information protected from disclosure by statute, sensitive personal or business information,
trade secrets, financial information, or confidential research, development, or commercial
information (by executing the form of certification set forth at Attachment A hereto).
a.
If a party produces documents that contain information which qualifies to
be CONFIDENTIAL information and the producing party has not designated such information
as CONFIDENTIAL, then counsel for another party may designate such information as
CONFIDENTIAL within 30 days of production of such documents. Inadvertent or unintentional
delay in making such a designation as to documents produced by another party shall not be
deemed a waiver, in whole or in part, of the right to designate documents as CONFIDENTIAL as
otherwise allowed by this Order.
3.
Portions of depositions shall be deemed CONFIDENTIAL only if designated as
such when the deposition is taken, or within seven business days after receipt of the transcript.
Such designation shall be made in writing and shall be specific – by reference to page and line
numbers - as to the portions to be protected. Deposition testimony designated CONFIDENTIAL
must concern sensitive personal or business information, trade secrets, financial information, or
confidential research, development or commercial information.
a.
Documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL under this Order shall not be
used or disclosed by the parties or counsel for the parties or any other persons identified below
(¶3b) for any purposes whatsoever, other than preparing for and conducting this litigation
(including any appeal of this litigation).
b.
The parties and counsel for the parties shall not disclose or permit the
disclosure of any documents designated CONFIDENTIAL under the terms of this Order to any
other person or entity except as set forth in subparagraphs (1)-(5) below, and then only after the
person to whom disclosure is to be made has executed an acknowledgment that he or she has
read and understands the terms of this Order and is bound by it. Subject to these requirements,
the following categories of persons may be allowed to review documents which have been
designated CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to this Order:
1)
Counsel appearing herein for the parties, and employees of such
counsel, who have responsibility for the preparation and trial of the lawsuit;
2)
Parties and employees of a party to this Order, but only to the
extent that counsel shall certify that the specifically named individual party or employees’
assistance is necessary to the conduct of this litigation (in the form set forth at Attachment B
hereto);
3)
Court reporters engaged for depositions and those persons, if any,
specifically engaged for the limited purpose of making photocopies of documents;
4)
Consultants, investigators, or experts (hereinafter referred to
collectively as “experts”) employed by the parties or counsel for the parties to assist in the
preparation and trial of the lawsuit; and
5)
Other persons, only upon consent of the producing party or upon
order of the Court, and on such conditions as are agreed to or ordered.
c.
Counsel for the parties shall take reasonable efforts to prevent
unauthorized disclosure of documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL pursuant to the terms of
this Order. Counsel shall maintain a record of those persons, including employees of counsel,
who have reviewed or been given access to the documents, along with the originals of the forms
signed by those parties acknowledging their obligations under this Order.
d.
All copies, duplicates, extracts, summaries or descriptions (hereinafter
referred to collectively as “copies”), of documents designated as CONFIDENTIAL under this
Order or any portion of such documents, shall be immediately affixed with the designation
“CONFIDENTIAL” if the word does not already appear on the copy. All such copies shall be
afforded the full protection of this Order.
4.
In the event a party seeks to file any material that is subject to protection under
this Order with the Court, that party shall take appropriate action to insure that the documents
receive proper protection from public disclosure, including: (1) filing redacted documents with
the consent of the party who designated the document as CONFIDENTIAL; (2) where
appropriate (e.g. in relation to discovery and evidentiary motions), submitting the documents
solely for in camera review; or (3) where the preceding measures are not adequate, seeking
permission to file the document under seal pursuant to the procedural steps set forth in Fed. R.
Civ. Proc. 26(c). Absent extraordinary circumstances making prior consultation impractical or
inappropriate, the party seeking to submit the document to the Court shall first consult with
counsel for the party who designated the document as CONFIDENTIAL to determine if some
measure less restrictive than filing the document under seal may serve to provide adequate
protection. This duty exists irrespective of the duty to consult on the underlying Motion. Nothing
in this Order shall be construed as a prior directive to the Clerk to allow any document to be filed
under seal. The parties understand that documents may be filed under seal only with the
permission of the Court, after proper Motion pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 26(c).
5.
Any CONFIDENTIAL designation is subject to challenge. The following
procedures shall apply to any such challenge.
a.
A party who contends that documents designated CONFIDENTIAL are
not entitled to confidential treatment shall give written notice to the party who affixed the
designation of the specific basis for the challenge within fifteen (15) days from service of the
document. The parties shall confer within fifteen (15) days from service of said written notice to
determine if the dispute can be resolved without judicial intervention; if not, either party may
seek the assistance of the Court.
b.
Notwithstanding any challenge to the designation of documents as
CONFIDENTIAL, all material previously designated CONFIDENTIAL shall continue to be
treated as subject to the full protections of this Order until one of the following occurs:
1)
The party who claims that the documents are CONFIDENTIAL
withdraws such designation in writing; or,
2)
The Court rules that the documents should no longer be
designated as CONFIDENTIAL information.
c.
Challenges to the confidentiality of documents may be made at any time
and are not waived by the failure to raise the challenge at the time of initial disclosure or
designation.
d.
All provisions of this Order restricting the use of documents designated
CONFIDENTIAL shall continue to be binding after the conclusion of the litigation unless
otherwise agreed or ordered.
e.
Within thirty (30) days after the conclusion of the litigation, including
conclusion of any appeal, all documents and deposition material treated as CONFIDENTIAL
under this Order, including copies as defined above (¶ 3.d.) shall be returned to the producing
party unless: (1) the document has been entered as evidence or filed (unless introduced or filed
under seal); (2) the parties stipulate to destruction of the documents in lieu of return; or (3) as to
documents containing the notations, summations, or other mental impressions of the receiving
party, that party elects to destroy the document. Within forty-five (45) days following
termination of this litigation, counsel shall serve a writing upon the parties setting forth the
manner in which they have complied with these obligations. Notwithstanding the above
requirements to return or destroy documents, counsel may retain attorney work product so long
as that work product does not duplicate verbatim substantial portions of the text of
CONFIDENTIAL documents or the CONFIDENTIAL information within. This work product
continues to be confidential under the terms of this Order. An attorney may use his or her work
product in a subsequent litigation provided that its use does not disclose the CONFIDENTIAL
documents or information within.
6.
This Order shall be subject to modification on Motion of any party or any other
person who may show an adequate interest in the matter to intervene for purposes of addressing
the scope and terms of this Order. The Order shall not, however, be modified until the parties
shall have been given notice and an opportunity to be heard on the proposed modification.
7.
The parties agree that this Confidentiality Order encompasses both the disclosure
of the physical documents and communications regarding the contents of the documents.
8.
The undersigned submits to the jurisdiction of the United States District Court for
the Middle District of Tennessee in matters relating to the Confidentiality Order and understands
that the terms of said Order obligate her to use discovery materials designated CONFIDENTIAL
solely for the purposes of the above-captioned action, to return all such materials and copies, and
not to disclose any such confidential information to any other person, firm, or entity.
9.
The undersigned acknowledges that violation of the Confidentiality Order may
result in penalties for contempt of Court.
10.
The undersigned hereby acknowledges that they have read the Confidentiality
Order, understand the terms thereof, and agree to be bound by such terms.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this ___________ day of July, 2012.
31st
s/ John S. Bryant
____________________________________
Honorable John Bryant
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
APPROVED FOR ENTRY:
/s/ Kristin Fecteau
Kristin Fecteau, Esq., BPR# 19772
Law Office of Kristen Fecteau
501 Union Street, Suite 307
Nashville, Tennessee 37219
(615) 248-8600
Attorney for Plaintiffs/Counter-Defendants
/s/ L. Gino Marchetti, Jr.
L. Gino Marchetti, Esq., BPR# 5562
William B. Hicky, Esq., BPR# 25452
Taylor, Pigue, Marchetti & Blair, PLLC
2908 Poston Avenue
Nashville, TN 37203
Phone (615) 320-3225
Attorneys for Defendants/Counter-Plaintiff
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
JAMES HUFFNAGLE, JAMES HEARN,
REINHOLD HOLTKAMP,
WILLIAM HEMRICK, MEL MARTIN, and
HOWARD LUARTES, individually and in his
Capacity as Member and Director, on behalf of
TEA PARTY HD, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ANTHONY LOIACONO, individually and
d/b/a HEADS & TAILS, INC., a suspended
California corporation,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:11-cv--01009
JURY DEMAND
EXHIBIT A – DESIGNATION OF CONFIDENTIALITY
Documents produced herewith whose Bates numbers are listed below have been marked
as CONFIDENTIAL subject to the Confidentiality Order entered in this action which Order is
dated 27th day of July, 2012.
48-173: Bank Statements of Heads & Tails, Inc.
174-191: Board of Director Minutes for Heads & Tails, Inc.
By signing below, I am certifying that I have personally reviewed the marked documents
and believe, based on that review, they are properly subject to protection under the terms of the
Confidentiality Order.
[Check and complete one of the two options below].
X
______
“I am a member of the Tennessee Bar. My Tennessee Bar number is 025452.”
“I am not a member of the Tennessee Bar, but am admitted to the bar of one or
more states. The state which I conduct the majority of my practice is
____________________________ where by Bar number is ____________. I
understand that by completing this certification I am submitting to the jurisdiction
of the United States District Court for the Middle District of Tennessee as to any
matter relating to this certification.”
/s/ William B. Hicky
Signature of Counsel
William B. Hicky
Printed Name of Counsel
July 27, 2012
Date
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
JAMES HUFFNAGLE, JAMES HEARN,
REINHOLD HOLTKAMP,
WILLIAM HEMRICK, MEL MARTIN, and
HOWARD LUARTES, individually and in his
Capacity as Member and Director, on behalf of
TEA PARTY HD, LLC,
Plaintiffs,
v.
ANTHONY LOIACONO, individually and
d/b/a HEADS & TAILS, INC., a suspended
California corporation,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:11-cv--01009
JURY DEMAND
EXHIBIT B – DISCLOSURE OF CONFIDENTIAL MATERIAL
Pursuant to the Confidentiality Order entered in this action, most particularly the
provisions of Paragraph 3.b.2., I certify that the assistance of ____________________________
is reasonably necessary to the conduct of this litigation and that this assistance requires the
disclosure to this individual of information which has been designated as CONFIDENTIAL.
I have explained the terms of the Confidentiality Order to the individual named above
and will obtain his or her signature on any “Acknowledgment of Understanding and Agreement
to be Bound” form prior to releasing any confidential documents to the named individual, and I
will release only such confidential documents as are reasonably necessary to the conduct of the
litigation.
The individual named above is:
“A named party”;
“An employee of named party” ___________________________. This
employee’s job title is _________________________ and work address is
_____________________________________________________________;
“Expert witness(es)”
. This expert’s job
title is
and work address is
_____________________________________________________________.
Signature
Date
We So Move:
We Consent:
/s/ L. Gino Marchetti, Jr.
L. Gino Marchetti, Jr., BPR #5562
William B. Hicky, BPR #25452
Taylor, Pigue, Marchetti & Blair, PLLC
2908 Poston Avenue
Nashville, Tennessee 37203
(615) 320-3225
(615) 320-3244 Fax
/s/ Kristin Fecteau
Kristin Fecteau, BPR #19772
Law Office of Kristin Fecteau
501 Union Street, Suite 307
Nashville, Tennessee 37219
(615) 248-8600
(615) 248-8111 Fax
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?