Abou-Rahma v. Stewart

Filing 16

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered, the instant § 2254 petition 1 lacks merit. Therefore, the petition is DENIED and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules --- § 2254 Cases. Should the petitioner file a timely Notice of Appeal from this order, such Notice shall be accompanied by a Memorandum identifying specific issues for appellate review and addressing the question of why a certificate of appealability should issue. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473 (2000). It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/21/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(tmw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

MAREY ABOU-RAHMA
Petitioner,
v.
HENRY STEWART, WARDEN
Respondent.

]
]
]
]
]
]
]

No. 3:11-1036
Judge Sharp

O R D E R
In accordance with the Memorandum contemporaneously entered,
the instant § 2254 petition (Docket Entry No.1) lacks merit.
Therefore, the petition is DENIED and this action is hereby
DISMISSED. Rule 8(a), Rules --- § 2254 Cases.
Should the petitioner file a timely Notice of Appeal from this
order, such Notice shall be accompanied by a Memorandum identifying
specific issues for appellate review and addressing the question of
why a certificate of appealability should issue. Slack v. McDaniel,
529 U.S. 473 (2000).
It is so ORDERED.

____________________________
Kevin H. Sharp
United States District Judge