Green v. State of Tennessee

Filing 53

ORDER: The petitioner has since filed what is liberally being construed as a motion to reconsider 52 the dismissal of the instant action. The finds no merit in the petitioners motion to reconsider. Accordingly, said motion is hereby DENIED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/13/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Green v. State of Tennessee

Doc. 53

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

BOBBY D. GREEN
Petitioner,

]
]
]
]
]
]
]

v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE
Respondent.

No. 3:11-1120
Judge Trauger

O R D E R
By an order (Docket Entry No.15) entered December 27, 2011,
the instant pro se habeas corpus action was dismissed for want of
prosecution. An appeal of that ruling was also dismissed for want
of prosecution. Docket Entry No.51.
The

petitioner

has

since

filed

what

is

liberally

being

construed as a motion to reconsider (Docket Entry No.52) the
dismissal of the instant action.
The finds no merit in the petitioner’s motion to reconsider.
Accordingly, said motion is hereby DENIED.
It is so ORDERED.

____________________________
Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge

Dockets.Justia.com