Roberts et al v. State of Tennessee et al

Filing 121

ORDER: Therefore, motions identified as Docket Entry Nos. 111 and 115 areDENIED without prejudice to their being refiled bearing the signatures of both plaintiff Roberts and plaintiff Murdock. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 8/6/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CHARLES H. ROBERTS, et al.,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiffs,
v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE, et al.,
Defendants.

NO. 3:11-1127
Judge Sharp/Bryant

O R D E R
The undersigned Magistrate Judge has previously denied
without prejudice a number of motions filed by plaintiff Roberts
that did not include the signature of plaintiff Murdock (Docket
Entry No. 110). Plaintiff Roberts has filed two additional motions
(Docket Entry Nos. 111 and 115) that suffer from the same defect.
For reasons more fully explained in the Court’s earlier memorandum
and order, plaintiff Roberts may represent himself pro se in this
action, but he is not permitted to represent plaintiff Murdock.
Therefore, motions identified as Docket Entry Nos. 111 and 115 are
DENIED

without

prejudice

to

their

being

refiled

bearing

the

signatures of both plaintiff Roberts and plaintiff Murdock.
It is so ORDERED.
s/ John S. Bryant
JOHN S. BRYANT
United States Magistrate Judge