Roberts et al v. State of Tennessee et al

Filing 225

ORDER: For the reasons stated above, the above-referenced motions 150 , 155 , 159 & 202 are DENIED as moot. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 3/18/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CHARLES H. ROBERTS, et al.,
Plaintiffs
v.
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, et al.,
Defendants

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:11-1127
Judge Sharp/Bryant
Jury Demand

O R D E R
By previous order, the Court has denied Plaintiffs’
motions for preliminary injunction (Docket Entry No. 224).
Additional pending motions are related to Plaintiffs’
motions for preliminary injunction and have been rendered moot.
Specifically, Plaintiffs’ “Motion for a Separate Speedy and Public
Trial

on

the

Previously

Submitted

Motion

for

a

Preliminary

Injunction” (Docket Entry No. 150); Plaintiffs’ “Motion to Add
Parties to be Subpoenaed” (Docket Entry No. 155); Plaintiffs’
“Motion

to

Ascertain

Status”

(Docket

Entry

No.

159);

and

Plaintiffs’ “Motion for an Evidentiary Hearing with Subpoenaed
Witnesses” (Docket Entry No. 202). All of these motions are related
to Plaintiffs’ now denied motions for preliminary injunction, and,
therefore, these motions have been rendered moot.
For

the

reasons

stated

above,

the

above-referenced

motions are DENIED as moot.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/ John S. Bryant
JOHN S. BRYANT
United States Magistrate Judge