Thompson v. Hall et al

Filing 68

ORDER: The court has reviewed these filings and the record as a whole de novo and, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed herewith, finds that the plaintiff's objections lack merit. The plaintiff's objections are therefore OVERRULED, and the R&R is ADOPTED AND APPROVED in all respects. The defendants Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 3/4/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.) (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (afs)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION RAY N. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS and JOHN DOE #4, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 3:11-cv-1232 Judge Trauger Magistrate Judge Brown ORDER Before the court is defendant Correct Care Solutions, Inc.’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 33), a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) (ECF No. 63) from Magistrate Judge Brown recommending that the defendant’s motion be granted and that the claims asserted against defendant John Doe 4 be dismissed for failure to obtain service of process, and the plaintiff’s objections (ECF No. 65) to the R&R. The court has reviewed these filings and the record as a whole de novo and, for the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion filed herewith, finds that the plaintiff’s objections lack merit. The plaintiff’s objections are therefore OVERRULED, and the R&R is ADOPTED AND APPROVED in all respects. The defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED in its entirety. All other pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. It is so ORDERED. Aleta A. Trauger United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?