Hamby v. Logan et al
Filing
31
ORDER: In the absence of any opposition, this Motion for Entry of Order Relate to Production of Health Information 27 is Granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge John S. Bryant on 4/19/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
ORDER:
_______
In the absence of any
opposition, this motion
is granted.
s/ John S. Bryant
U.S. Magistrate Judge
WILLIAM DAVIDSON HAMBY, JR.,
Plaintiff,
v.
DR. NONA SETLER-LOGAN AND
NURSE KAREN DUGDEN-KUNDAR,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
) No.: 3:12-CV-0056
)
) JUDGE TRAUGER
)
)
MOTION FOR ENTRY OF ORDER
RELATED TO PRODUCTION OF HEALTH INFORMATION
Defendants Nona Setler-Logan and Karen Dugden-Kundar (collectively “Defendants”),
by and through his undersigned counsel, file this motion for entry of an order to allow
undersigned counsel to obtain copies of the medical health information and medical health
records of Plaintiff, William Davidson Hamby, Jr. As grounds for this motion, Defendants show
as follows:
Plaintiff alleges in this case that he suffered a variety of damages as a result of an alleged
failure of the Defendants to provide adequate medical treatment. Entry of this order will
substantially assist Defendants in their evaluation of this matter, particularly Plaintiff’s damages,
and will hasten the resolution of this dispute. Further, Defendants would show that two separate
attempts have been made to obtain – on March 7 and 22, 2012 – to obtain an authorization from
Plaintiff allowing them to gather his medical records. (Letters to Plaintiff are attached as
collective Exhibit A). To date, Defendants have received no response.
WHEREFORE, good grounds having been shown for the granting of this motion,
Defendants respectfully request that this motion be granted and this Court enter the attached
Order.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?