Dhillon v. State of Tennessee Health Related Board of Medical Examiners et al
Filing
132
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 126 ) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 129 and 130). Plaintiff's request for oral arg ument is DENIED. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overr uled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff's claim for injunctive relief is DISMISSED without prejudice. All claims now having been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to close this file. Any othe r pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/11/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
GURSHEEL S. DHILLON, M.D.
v.
STATE OF TENNESSEE HEALTH
RELATED BOARD OF MEDICAL
EXAMINERS, et al.
)
)
) NO. 3-12-0151
) JUDGE CAMPBELL
)
)
)
ORDER
Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket
No. 126) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket Nos. 129 and 130).1 Plaintiff’s request for
oral argument is DENIED.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the
Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The
Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and
approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s claim for injunctive relief is DISMISSED without prejudice.2
All claims now having been dismissed, the Clerk is directed to close this file. Any other
pending Motions are denied as moot. This Order shall constitute the final judgment in this case
pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 58.
1
Plaintiff’s filings are entitled “Plaintiff’s Motion to Disqualification of Magistrate Judge,
Plaintiff’s Motion to Object to Magistrate’s Finding of Younger Abstention, Plaintiff’s Motion to Set
Aside the Court’s Order and Motion for a New Trial” and Amended “Plaintiff’s Motion to
Disqualification of Magistrate Judge, Plaintiff’s Motion to Object to Magistrate’s Finding of Younger
Abstention, Plaintiff’s Motion to Set Aside the Court’s Order and Motion for a New Trial.” Docket
Nos. 129 and 130.
2
In addition, Plaintiff’s Combined Appeal and Amended Appeal for Review of
Magistrate’s Order (Docket Nos. 109 and 114) are DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
___________________________________
TODD J. CAMPBELL
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?