United States of America v. Bogart et al

Filing 61

ORDER: The Report and Recommendations 53 is Accepted and Approved. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss 35 is Denied. Defendants' Motion for Consolidation 48 is Denied. This case is hereby returned to Magistrate Judge Brown for further pretrial case management. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/30/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff v. DUSTIN B. BOGART, et al., Defendants ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) 3:12-0179 Judge Sharp/Brown ORDER The Magistrate Judge has entered a Report and Recommendation (“R & R”) (Docket No. 53), recommending that Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 35) and Motion for Consolidation (Docket No. 48) be denied. Even though Defendants were specifically informed in the R & R that any objections were to be filed within fourteen days of receipt, no objections have been filed. Having considered the matters presented by the motions and the arguments raised by Defendants, the Court agrees with the Magistrate Judge’s conclusion that neither dismissal, nor consolidation is appropriate on this record. Accordingly, the Court rules as follows: (1) The R & R (Docket No. 53) is hereby ACCEPTED and APPROVED; (2) Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 35) is hereby DENIED; and (3) Defendants’ Motion for Consolidation (Docket No. 48) is hereby DENIED. This case is hereby returned to Magistrate Judge Brown for further pretrial case management. It is SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?