Lewis v. Vanderbilt University

Filing 3

MEMORANDUM signed by Chief Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/8/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CURTIS LEWIS Plaintiff, v. VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER Defendant. ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] No. 3:12-0435 Judge Campbell M E M O R A N D U M The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a resident of Nashville. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the Vanderbilt University Medical Center, seeking damages. In July, 2011, the plaintiff sought medical treatment at the Vanderbilt University Medical Center for injuries he sustained in an automobile accident. Apparently, the plaintiff is not satisfied with the care he received there and accuses the defendant of medical malpractice and negligence. In order to establish a claim for relief under § 1983, the plaintiff must plead and prove that the defendant, while acting under color of state law, deprived him of some right or privilege secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States. Parratt v. Taylor, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 1913 (1981). The defendant is a building and not a person that can be sued under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See e.g., Rhodes v.McDannel, 945 F.2d 117, 120 (6th Cir. 1991)(a county jail is not a person subject to suit under § 1983). Nor was the defendant, as a private entity, acting under color of state law when it provided the plaintiff with medical care. Consequently, the plaintiff has failed to state a claim upon which § 1983 relief can be granted. When a plaintiff proceeding in forma pauperis, as is the case here, has failed to state a claim for relief, the Court is obliged to dismiss the instant action sua sponte. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). An appropriate order will be entered. ____________________________ Todd Campbell United States District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?