Minick et al v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee et al
Filing
157
ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Metro Nashville's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 144 ) is GRANTED. The plaintiff's claims against Metro Nashville under § 1983 and under the Sheriff's Statute are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's TGTLA claim against Metro Nashville is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/4/2014. (hb) Modified text on 8/4/2014 (hb).
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
HEATHER MINICK, individually and as
)
surviving spouse of MICHAEL MINICK, and as )
co-administrator of the Estate of Michael
)
Minick,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF
)
NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY,
)
TENNESSEE, CHRISTOPHER FOSTER,
)
Individually and in his official capacity,
)
MATTHEW BARSHAW, individually and his )
official capacity; JEFFREY DAVIDSON,
)
individually and his official capacity; MORRIS )
CRAVEN, individually and in his official
)
capacity,
)
)
Defendants,
)
Case No. 3:12-cv-0524
Judge Aleta A. Trauger
ORDER
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Metro
Nashville’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 144) is GRANTED. The plaintiff’s claims against
Metro Nashville under § 1983 and under the Sheriff’s Statute are hereby DISMISSED
WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff’s TGTLA claim against Metro Nashville is hereby
DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
It is so ORDERED.
Enter this 4th day of August 2014.
_____________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
United States District Judge
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?