Minick et al v. Metropolitan Government of Nashville, Davidson County, Tennessee et al

Filing 157

ORDER: For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Metro Nashville's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 144 ) is GRANTED. The plaintiff's claims against Metro Nashville under § 1983 and under the Sheriff's Statute are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff's TGTLA claim against Metro Nashville is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 8/4/2014. (hb) Modified text on 8/4/2014 (hb).

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION HEATHER MINICK, individually and as ) surviving spouse of MICHAEL MINICK, and as ) co-administrator of the Estate of Michael ) Minick, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF ) NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, ) TENNESSEE, CHRISTOPHER FOSTER, ) Individually and in his official capacity, ) MATTHEW BARSHAW, individually and his ) official capacity; JEFFREY DAVIDSON, ) individually and his official capacity; MORRIS ) CRAVEN, individually and in his official ) capacity, ) ) Defendants, ) Case No. 3:12-cv-0524 Judge Aleta A. Trauger ORDER For the reasons set forth in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Metro Nashville’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 144) is GRANTED. The plaintiff’s claims against Metro Nashville under § 1983 and under the Sheriff’s Statute are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. The plaintiff’s TGTLA claim against Metro Nashville is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. It is so ORDERED. Enter this 4th day of August 2014. _____________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER United States District Judge 1  

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?