Harris v. Clark Construction Group

Filing 34

ORDER denying as moot 28 Motion for Leave to Serve Interrogatories and Reqest for Production. Signed by Magistrate Judge E. Clifton Knowles on 4/23/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

ORDER:
Motion denied as moot.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
AT NASHVILLE

STANLEY HARRIS
Plaintiff,
vs.
CLARK CONSTRUCTION GROUP,
Defendant.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

U.S. Magistrate Judge

Case No. 3:12-cv-0649

Judge Campbell/Knowles

PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO SERVE INTERROGATORIES AND
REQUEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS ON DEFENDANT

Comes Plaintiff and respectfully moves the court for an order allowing him leave to serve
interrogatories and request for production of documents on Defendant.
Plaintiff, acting pro se, filed six cases alleging discrimination and retaliation during his
employment with Defendants. Cases 3:12-cv-0647, 3:12-cv-0650, and 3:12-cv-0651 were filed
against Bell Associates, and 3:12-cv-0648, 3:12-cv-0649, and 3:12-cv-0652 were filed against
Clark Construction Group. A Scheduling Order was entered on September 4, 2012, setting the
deadline for written discovery on March 5, 2013. Plaintiff retained counsel on January 31, 2013,
and a Limited Notice of Appearance was filed the same day.
In support of his motion, Plaintiff would show that the scheduling order required the
parties to serve discovery requests in sufficient time for the responding party to have time to
serve responses by the end of discovery on March 1, 2013. Counsel for Plaintiff was retained
and entered her notice of limited appearance on January 31, 2013.

Upon entering her

appearance, counsel for Plaintiff prepared and filed Plaintiff’s motion to file a late response to