Fletcher v. United States of America

Filing 26

ORDER: In accordance with the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the movant's motion seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence 1 is hereby DENIED. This action, therefore, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. A certificate of appealability will not issue as to any of the claims set forth in the movant's motion. Rule 11(a), Rules Gov'g § 2255 Motions. The movant's motion to rule upon the merits 23 is therefore DENIED AS MOOT. Entry of this order shall constitute the judgment in this action. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/21/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
LAMARR FLETCHER,
Movant,
v.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3:12-cv-00830
Judge Trauger

ORDER
The movant, Lamarr Fletcher, proceeding pro se, has filed a motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255
to vacate, set aside, or correct his sentence. (Docket No. 1). The movant presently is incarcerated
at the Lexington Federal Medical Center in Lexington, Kentucky.
In accordance with the Memorandum entered contemporaneously herewith, the movant’s
motion seeking to vacate, set aside, or correct sentence (Docket No. 1) is hereby DENIED. This
action, therefore, is hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Rule 8(a), Rules – § 2255 Cases.
A certificate of appealability will not issue as to any of the claims set forth in the movant’s motion.
Rule 11(a), Rules Gov’g § 2255 Motions. The movant’s motion to rule upon the merits (Docket
No. 23) is therefore DENIED AS MOOT.
Entry of this order shall constitute the judgment in this action.
It is so ORDERED.

____________________________
Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge