McElyea v. Dickson County et al
Filing
3
MEMORANDUM OPINION OF THE COURT. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 8/31/2012. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(eh)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CHARLES H. McELYEA, JR.
Plaintiff,
v.
DICKSON COUNTY, et al.
Defendants.
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
No. 3:12-0881
Judge Campbell
M E M O R A N D U M
The plaintiff, proceeding pro se, is a resident of McEwen,
Tennessee. He brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1985
against Dickson County; Larry Wallace, a Chancery Court Judge in
Dickson County; Nancy Miller, Clerk and Master of the Dickson
County Chancery Court, and Eric Thornton, Kyle Sanders, and Hilary
Duke, members of the Dickson County Bar; seeking injunctive relief
and damages.
The plaintiff alleges that he was denied due process and the
equal protection of the law by the defendants during a judicial
proceeding in the Chancery Court of Dickson County on May 7, 2010.
The complaint was filed on August 28, 2012. The plaintiff’s
claims arose on May 7, 2010. Thus, it appears that this action is
time-barred by the one year statute of limitations imposed upon §
1985 claims brought in Tennessee. Windsor v. A Federal Executive
Agency, 614 F.Supp. 1255, 1262 (M.D. Tenn.1983), aff’d 767 F.2d 923
(6th Cir. 1985).
Nothing in the complaint suggests that the statute should be
tolled so as to permit the untimely filing of the complaint. The
Court, therefore, concludes that the plaintiff has failed to state
a
timely
claim
upon
which
relief
can
be
granted.
Dellis
v.
Corrections Corp. of America, 257 F.3d 508, 511 (6th Cir.2001)(sua
sponte dismissal of an untimely complaint is appropriate). Under
such circumstances, the Court is obliged to dismiss the complaint.
28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
An appropriate order will be entered.
____________________________
Todd Campbell
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?