Zander et al v. Katz, Sapper & Miller, LLP et al
Filing
269
ORDER granting 265 Motion for Leave to File Response in Excess of 25 Pages. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 8/26/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
JEFFREY J. ZANDER, individually and
as Trustee of the CARDINAL TRUST
under Agreement dated February 11,
2009, and JJZ INSURANCE AGENCY,
a Tennessee general partnership d/b/a
ZANDER INSURANCE GROUP,
Plaintiffs,
v.
KATZ, SAPPER & MILLER, LLP;
KSM BUSINESS SERVICES, INC., and
ANDREW J. MANCHIR,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:12-cv-00967
PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE RESPONSE IN EXCESS OF 25 PAGES
Plaintiffs request leave to file a single memorandum, 35 pages in length, in response to
three separate and interlocking post-trial Motions filed by Defendants. In support of this Motion,
Plaintiffs state as follows:
1. On August 12, 2014, Defendants filed three separate post-trial motions, supported
by three separate memoranda of law. Two of those Memoranda were 25 pages (see
Dkts. 250-1 and 251-1), while the third (Dkt. 249-1) provided an additional 13 pages of
legal argument for a total of 63 pages.
2. As is shown in the Response to Defendants’ Post-Trial Motions (Dkt. 264),
Defendants’ Motions overlap and are best and most efficiently analyzed as a single
Motion seeking alternative relief under Rules 50 and 59. Such an omnibus response will
save time and enhance the ease of analyzing the post-trial motions.
{00075448.DOCX / ver: }
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?