American Federation of Musicians for the United States and Canada, AFL-CIO v. Adams et al

Filing 27

ORDER: Counsel for the parties shall convene another telephone conference call with the Court on Tuesday, 5/7/2013, at 10:00 a.m., central time, to address whether the defendants have made a firm and realistic offer, the plaintiff's position on the offer, and, if a resolution of this case is not possible, to address the plaintiff's outstanding written discovery, any protective order suggested by the defendants, and any other appropriate matters. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 5/3/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF
MUSICIANS OF THE UNITED
STATES AND CANADA, AFL-CIO
v.
JIMMY L. ADAMS d/b/a J.A.M,
LLC; and JIMMY ADAMS MEDIA,
LLC

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

No. 3-12-0969

ORDER
Counsel for the parties called the Court on April 25, 2013, at which time counsel addressed
the plaintiff's outstanding written discovery to which the defendants have not yet responded, the
defendants' objections to the written discovery, and defendants' request for a protective order as to
at least some of the requested documents. Counsel also addressed any remaining potential for
settlement. Defendants' counsel advised that he understood that the defendants might be in a
position to effectuate a settlement. As a result, a further telephone conference call was scheduled
on May 1, 2013, at which time defendants' counsel advised that the defendants were not in a position
to effectuate a settlement under the previous terms, but defendants' counsel committed to
determining if any offer could be made.
Counsel for the parties shall convene another telephone conference call with the Court on
Tuesday, May 7, 2013, at 10:00 a.m., central time, to address whether the defendants have made
a firm and realistic offer, the plaintiff's position on the offer, and, if a resolution of this case is not
possible, to address the plaintiff's outstanding written discovery, any protective order suggested by
the defendants, and any other appropriate matters.
It is so ORDERED.

JULIET GRIFFIN
United States Magistrate Judge