Ibrahim v. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. et al

Filing 11

ORDER: On the same day the Court entered an order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction 4 , plaintiff Shemeka Ibrahim filed a First Amended Complaint 7 , apparently to correct grammatical errors in the original complaint. To the extent the amended complaint might be construed as a motion for permission to amend the complaint or as a motion to reconsider dismissal of the case, such motion, however construed, is without merit and is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. The proposed amendment does not affect the fundamental defect in the original complaint, as it too fails to state a claim over which this Court has subject-matter jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 10/22/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION

SHEMEKA IBRAHIM,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MURFREESBORO MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A.,
)
DR. ANDREW H. FORD,
)
SLEEP MEDICINE OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE, and )
DR. KELLY A. CARDEN,
)
)
Defendants.
)

Case No. 3:12-cv-1019
Judge Sharp

ORDER
On the same day the Court entered an order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject-matter
jurisdiction (ECF No. 4), plaintiff Shemeka Ibrahim filed a First Amended Complaint (ECF No. 7),
apparently to correct grammatical errors in the original complaint.
To the extent the amended complaint might be construed as a motion for permission to amend
the complaint or as a motion to reconsider dismissal of the case, such motion, however construed, is
without merit and is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. The proposed amendment does not affect the
fundamental defect in the original complaint, as it too fails to state a claim over which this Court has
subject-matter jurisdiction.
It is so ORDERED.

Kevin H. Sharp
United States District Judge