Ibrahim v. Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. et al
Filing
15
ORDER: The plaintiff has now filed a document styled "Motion/Complaint for an Appeal," in which the plaintiff appears to request permission to transfer her case to the "appeal court in Nashville, Tennessee" and to "grant [her ] appeal and allow [her] to forward this case to the State of Tennessee Appeals Court." Insofar as the plaintiff seeks transfer of her case to the Tennessee Court of Appeals, such motion is DENIED, because this Court has no power to transfer an appeal to the state appellate court. Because the plaintiff's motion may be construed as a notice of appeal, the Clerk of Court is DIRECTED to provide notice thereof to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals. In accordance with Rule 24, the Court HER EBY CERTIFIES that an appeal of the dismissal of this case would not be taken in good faith. If the plaintiff seeks to pursue an appeal in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, she MUST either submit the full $455 appellate filing fee to the Clerk of this Court, or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis directly in the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, within 30 days of service of this order. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 11/27/12. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail. 6CCA via e-mail)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
SHEMEKA IBRAHIM,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
MURFREESBORO MEDICAL CLINIC, P.A.,
)
DR. ANDREW H. FORD,
)
SLEEP MEDICINE OF MIDDLE TENNESSEE, and )
DR. KELLY A. CARDEN,
)
)
Defendants.
)
Case No. 3:12-cv-1019
Judge Sharp
ORDER
This Court entered an order dismissing the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction on
October 16, 2012 (ECF No. 4), and subsequently denied as moot plaintiff Shemeka Ibrahim’s motion for
leave to file an amended complaint.
The plaintiff has now filed a document styled “Motion/Complaint for an Appeal,” in which the
plaintiff appears to request permission to transfer her case to the “appeal court in Nashville, Tennessee”
and to “grant [her] appeal and allow [her] to forward this case to the State of Tennessee Appeals Court.”
(ECF No. 14, at 1.) She acknowledges in this filing that “[l]awsuits alleging medical malpractice are
generally filed in a state trial court,” but she also claims that “[f]ederal courts may also be appropriate for
filing malpractice claims where a complete diversity of state citizenship exists . . . or if a federal question
is invoked.” (Id.)
Insofar as the plaintiff seeks transfer of her case to the Tennessee Court of Appeals, such motion
is DENIED, because this Court has no power to transfer an appeal to the state appellate court. To
pursue her claims in the Tennessee Court of Appeals, the plaintiff must first file an action in the
Tennessee state trial court. Appeals from this Court are to the United States Court of Appeals for the
Sixth Circuit, located in Cincinnati, Ohio.
Because the plaintiff’s motion may be construed as a notice of appeal, the Clerk of Court is
DIRECTED to provide notice thereof to the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals.
2
The plaintiff was permitted to file her complaint in forma pauperis. Pursuant to Rule 24 of the
Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, “a party who was permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in the
district-court action . . . may proceed on appeal in forma pauperis without further authorization, unless . . .
the district court . . . certifies that the appeal is not take in good faith or finds that the party is not
otherwise entitled to proceed in forma pauperis and states in writing its reasons for the certification or
finding.” In accordance with Rule 24, the Court HEREBY CERTIFIES that an appeal of the dismissal of
this case would not be taken in good faith. The Court lacks jurisdiction of the plaintiff’s claims because
they are grounded entirely in state law, and are asserted against defendants who, like the plaintiff, reside
in Tennessee. In short, neither federal-question nor diversity jurisdiction exists.
Because the present appeal is not taken in good faith, the plaintiff may not pursue an appeal in
forma pauperis unless she seeks and obtains permission directly from the Sixth Circuit to proceed as a
pauper. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3); Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(3) and (a)(5). Accordingly, if the plaintiff seeks to
pursue an appeal in the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, she MUST either submit the full $455 appellate
filing fee to the Clerk of this Court, or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis directly in the Court of
Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, within 30 days of service of this order. Fed. R. App. P. 24(a)(5). The motion
must comply with Rule 24(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, and must be filed at the
following address:
Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals, Clerk’s Office, Room 540, Potter Stewart U.S.
Courthouse, 100 E. Fifth Street, Cincinnati, OH 45202. The plaintiff will be permitted to appeal to the
Sixth Circuit without paying the appellate filing fee only if the Sixth Circuit grants the motion.
The plaintiff is forewarned that failure either to submit the full $455 filing fee or to obtain leave
directly from the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals to proceed on appeal in forma pauperis will result in
dismissal of the appeal.
The Clerk of Court is instructed for forward a copy of this order to the Clerk for the Sixth Circuit
Court of Appeals.
It is so ORDERED.
Kevin H. Sharp
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?