ThomCorp, Inc. v. Amec Industry, Inc.
Filing
32
ORDER: Telephone conference held on 11/14/13. The parties advised that they did have some discovery issues that they needed to confer about. If the parties are unable to resolve their differences then they should schedule a telephone conference with the Magistrate Judge to see if the matters could be resolved without the filing of formal discovery motions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 11/15/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
THOMCORP,, INC. d/b/a THOMTEC
INDUSTRIAL SALES COMPANY,
Plaintiff
v.
AMEC INDUSTRY, INC.,
Defendant
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:12-1075
Judge Sharp/Brown
Jury Demand
O R D E R
A telephone conference was held with the parties in this
matter on November 14, 2013. The Plaintiff has filed a motion for
partial summary judgment (Docket Entry 31), which will be responded
to in accordance with the scheduling order in this matter (Docket
Entry 29).
The parties advised that they did have some discovery
issues that they needed to confer about. If the parties are unable
to resolve their differences then they should schedule a telephone
conference with the Magistrate Judge to see if the matters could be
resolved without the filing of formal discovery motions.
The parties did not see at this point any need for
changes to the scheduling order. The parties further advised that
mediation would be more likely once they had obtained a decision on
the pending motion for partial summary judgment. If granted, the
motion would essentially leave only damages to be decided.
The parties are advised the Magistrate Judge stands ready
to assist with alternative dispute resolution at their request at
any point.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?