Crowder v. G.UB.MK Constructors et al
Filing
33
ORDER: The Magistrate Judge's 30 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION is ACCEPTED and the nonparties' 15 , 17 , 19 motions to quash summons and service of summons and/or motions to dismiss are GRANTED. WorleyParsons Group, Inc., URS Energy & Construction, Inc., and Williams Plant Services, LLC are dismissed as defts in this action. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 2/12/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(rd)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
RITA CROWDER,
Plaintiff,
v.
G.UB.MK CONSTRUCTORS, et al.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
No. 3:12-cv-01138
Judge Sharp
ORDER
On January 2, 2013, the Magistrate Judge entered a Report and Recommendation (Docket
No. 30) recommending that three nonparties’ Motions to Quash Summons and Service of
Summons and/or Motions to Dismiss (Docket Nos. 15, 17, & 19) be granted and that
WorleyParsons Group, Inc., Williams Plant Services, LLC, and URS Energy & Construction,
Inc. be dismissed as defendants in this action. No objections to the Report and Recommendation
were filed.
The Court has reviewed the matter in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R.
Civ. P. 72(b), and Rule 72.03, Local Rules of Court. After reviewing the record, the Court finds
no error in the Magistrate Judge’s recommendation. Accordingly, it is ACCEPTED and the
motions to dismiss are GRANTED. The above-referenced nonparties are hereby dismissed as
defendants in this action.1
It is SO ORDERED.
____________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
1
The Court notes that the subsequently entered Initial Case Management Order (Docket No. 32) reflects
that Defendant G.UB.MK Constructors has waived service-related defenses with regard to itself.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?