Crosby v. State of Tennessee et al
ORDER: Therefore, the petitioner's Objections are OVERRULED. It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants' motions to dismiss (Docket Nos. 15 and 20) are GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. This Order constitutes the judgment in this case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 7/18/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(tmw)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
STATE OF TENNESSEE and
On June 11, 2013, the Magistrate Judge issued a Report and Recommendation (R&R)
(Docket No. 23) on the motions to dismiss filed by the respondents (Docket Nos. 15 and 20),
recommending that the motions be granted and the petition dismissed with prejudice.
Pending before the court are Objections to the R&R timely filed by the petitioner (Docket
No. 26) and a response filed by respondent Steward (Docket No. 27).
For the reasons explained more fully in the Memorandum entered contemporaneously
herewith, the court finds that the petitioner’s Objections lack merit. Therefore, the petitioner’s
Objections are OVERRULED. It is hereby ORDERED that the defendants’ motions to dismiss
(Docket Nos. 15 and 20) are GRANTED, and this case is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
This Order constitutes the judgment in this case.
It is so ORDERED.
Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?