City of Portland et al v. Volunteer State Bank

Filing 16

ORDER: Counsel for the parties shall convene another telephone conference call with the Court on Monday, 7/15/2013, at 9:00 a.m., to be initiated by defendant's counsel, to address the status of settlement discussions. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 6/21/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION CITY OF PORTLAND; and TENNESSEE MUNICIPAL LEAGUE RISK MANAGEMENT POOL, INC. v. VOLUNTEER STATE BANK ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3-12-1316 ORDER Pursuant to the order entered February 5, 2013 (Docket Entry No. 14), counsel for the parties called the Court on June 19, 2013, at which time the following matters were addressed: 1. The parties have exchanged written discovery, which is complete except for documents to be produced by the plaintiffs of electronically stored information, which the plaintiffs will serve by July 3, 2013. Counsel represented that they expect to take the depositions of two individual bank employees, a Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of the defendant, the city recorder, who may have moved out-of-state, other authorized users of the account, an IT person, and others with knowledge of the facts. 2. By June 21, 2013, the plaintiffs shall send a letter to the defendant with their settlement position and a formal settlement demand, to which the defendant shall respond by June 28, 2013. Thereafter, counsel shall continue to engage in any appropriate settlement discussions. 3. Counsel for the parties shall convene another telephone conference call with the Court on Monday, July 15, 2013, at 9:00 a.m., to be initiated by defendant's counsel, to address the status of settlement discussions. It is so ORDERED. JULIET GRIFFIN United States Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?