Hayes et al v. Burns et al
Filing
26
ORDER: Having reviewed the complaint de novo, the Court agrees that the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for relief from these defendants. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation 23 is ADOPTED and APPROVED in all respects. The defendants Motions to Dismiss 7 , 10 and 17 are hereby GRANTED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/23/13. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
MICHAEL HAYES and WENDY HAYES
Plaintiffs,
v.
THERESA BURNS, et al.
Defendants.
]
]
]
]
]
]
]
No. 3:13-0028
Judge Trauger
O R D E R
The Court has before it Motions to Dismiss (Docket Entry
Nos.7,10 and 17) from three of the defendants and a Report and
Recommendation (Docket Entry No.23) from the Magistrate Judge
addressing these Motions.
The plaintiffs have neither submitted pleadings in opposition
to the Motions to Dismiss nor timely objections to the Report and
Recommendation.
The plaintiffs are self professed “naturals of the Shaykamaxum
Atlan
Amexem
Empire”.
Most
of
the
complaint
consists
of
nonsensical, vague and conclusory statements. However, it appears
that the plaintiffs were not satisfied with the foreclosure of
certain mortgaged real estate belonging to them.
In
the
Report
and
Recommendation,
the
Magistrate
Judge
concluded that the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim upon
which relief can be granted. For that reason, he recommends that
the Court grant the defendants’ Motions to Dismiss.
Having reviewed the complaint de novo, the Court agrees that
the plaintiffs have failed to state a claim for relief from these
defendants. Accordingly, the Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED
and APPROVED in all respects. The defendants’ Motions to Dismiss
are hereby GRANTED.
It is so ORDERED.
____________________________
Aleta A. Trauger
United States District Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?