Reval Financial NPL, LLC v. Mukherji

Filing 43

ORDER: The Magistrate Judge has filed a Certification of Facts Regarding Possible Contempt (Docket No. 40 ) that is based on the failure of the defendant to fully answer some post-default judgment interrogatories. It is hereby ORDERED that, by September 30, 2013, the plaintiff shall edify this court as to the exact relief the plaintiff will be requesting, should this court hold the defendant in civil contempt. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 9/23/14. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(la)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION REVAL FINANCIAL NPL, LLC, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. ASHOKE MUKHERJI, Defendant. Civil No. 3:13-0048 Judge Trauger Magistrate Judge Knowles ORDER The Magistrate Judge has filed a Certification of Facts Regarding Possible Contempt (Docket No. 40) that is based on the failure of the defendant to fully answer some post-default judgment interrogatories. It is hereby ORDERED that, by September 30, 2013, the plaintiff shall edify this court as to the exact relief the plaintiff will be requesting, should this court hold the defendant in civil contempt. This non-compliance with a discovery order is ordinarily handled by the Magistrate Judge as a sanction matter, pursuant to Rule 37(b), FED. R. CIV. P., and 28 U.S.C. § 636(e)(4). Certainly the Magistrate Judge may award the plaintiff its attorney’s fees and costs, order the defendant to appear in his courtroom for the taking of a post-judgment deposition, or order other creative relief in a situation of this sort. It is so ORDERED. ENTER this 23rd day of September 2013. ________________________________ ALETA A. TRAUGER U.S. District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?