Reval Financial NPL, LLC v. Mukherji

Filing 69

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION: On April 4, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a "Certification of Facts Regarding Contempt/Report & Recommendation" (Docket No. 66 ), to which no objections have been filed. The Report and Recomm endation is, therefore, ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that the defendant is found in civil contempt, and the court hereby imposes a fine in the amount of $50 per day for a 30-day period or for a shorter time, if the defendant purges his contempt. The fine is to be paid into the Registry of this court. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to the pro se defendant at his present address, by certified mail, return receipt requested. It is so ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Aleta A. Trauger on 5/15/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(hb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
REVAL FINANCIAL NPL, LLC,

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Plaintiff,
v.
ASHOKE MUKHERJI,
Defendant.

Civil No. 3:13-0048
Judge Trauger
Magistrate Judge Knowles

ORDER
On April 4, 2014, the Magistrate Judge issued a “Certification of Facts Regarding
Contempt/Report & Recommendation” (Docket No. 66), to which no objections have been filed.
The Report and Recommendation is, therefore, ACCEPTED and made the findings of fact and
conclusions of law of this court. For the reasons expressed therein, it is hereby ORDERED that
the defendant is found in civil contempt, and the court hereby imposes a fine in the amount of
$50 per day1 for a 30-day period or for a shorter time, if the defendant purges his contempt. The
fine is to be paid into the Registry of this court.
The Clerk shall mail a copy of this Order to the pro se defendant at his present address,
by certified mail, return receipt requested.
It is so ORDERED.
ENTER this 15th day of May 2014.
________________________________
ALETA A. TRAUGER
U.S. District Judge

1

The court is aware that the Magistrate Judge accepted the request of the plaintiff that the
fine be in the amount of $150 per day. However, the court considers $50 per day a more
appropriate fine.