Clark v. E! Entertainment Television, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER granting 97 Motion for Leave to File Reply. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 7/31/2014. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.) (ds)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION COREY D. CLARK Plaintiff, vs. E! ENTERTAINMENT TELEVISION, LLC, and FOX BROADCASTING COMPANY, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CIV. NO. 3:13-cv-00058 JUDGE SHARP/KNOWLES JURY DEMAND ___________________________________ PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE REPLY IN SUPPORT OF HIS MOTION TO VACATE THE DISTRICT COURT’S ORDER AND JUDGMENT [Docket Nos. 90-92] IN ITS ENTIRETY PURSUANT TO RULES 59 AND 60 The Plaintiff, by and through counsel, Matthew Scott Martin, moves this Court for an order granting leave to file a reply to his Motion to Vacate the District Court’s Order and Judgment [Docket Nos. 90-92] in its Entirety Pursuant to Rules 59 and 60 (after this, simply “the Motion to Vacate”). In support of this motion, Plaintiff states as follows: 1) Undersigned counsel has conferred with counsel for both defendants regarding their position on Plaintiff’s filing of a motion for leave to a reply, and is authorized to state that neither counsel opposes the filing of the motion, albeit they do not consent to the motion. 2) On July 28, 2014, Defendants filed their responses (Docs. 95 and 96) to the Motion to Vacate.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?