Jeffers v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company et al

Filing 14

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10 ) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No.13). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. According ly, Plaintiff's Motion to Remand (Docket No. 6 ) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/8/2013. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(eh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION GREG JEFFERS v. METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE CO. ) ) ) NO. 3-13-0065 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ) ORDER Pending before the Court are a Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge (Docket No. 10) and Objections filed by the Plaintiff (Docket No.13). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3) and Local Rule 72.03(b)(3), the Court has reviewed de novo the Report and Recommendation, the Objections, and the file. The Objections of the Plaintiff are overruled, and the Report and Recommendation is adopted and approved. Accordingly, Plaintiff’s Motion to Remand (Docket No. 6) is DENIED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?