Silvestro et al v. Bank of America, N.A.

Filing 15

ORDER: Pending before the Court is Defendant's Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendants Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs' claims for negligence and violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 3/19/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(af)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DARICE E. SILVESTRO, et al. v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A. ) ) ) NO. 3-13-0066 ) JUDGE CAMPBELL ) ORDER Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 6). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant’s Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Plaintiffs’ claims for negligence and violation of the Tennessee Consumer Protection Act are DISMISSED. IT IS SO ORDERED. ___________________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?