Coppedge et al v. Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.

Filing 34

ORDER: For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.'s Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, Transfer Plaintiff Denise Coleman 15 is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and Plaintiff's Pla intiff Denise Coleman's Motion To Strike 26 is DENIED, as moot. The Clerk is directed to transfer the case of Denise Coleman to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 4/25/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION DENISE COLEMAN LOYD C. COPPEDGE RICHARD A. SIRCY, JR. TROY M. STEFFY v. DOLLAR TREE STORES, INC. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3-13-0069 JUDGE CAMPBELL ORDER Pending before the Court are Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, Transfer Plaintiff Denise Coleman (Docket No. 15); Plaintiff Denise Coleman’s Motion To Strike And Response In Opposition To Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, To Transfer Plaintiff Denise Coleman (Docket No. 26); and Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.’s Opposition to Plaintiff Denise Coleman’s Motion To Strike (Docket No. 32). For the reasons stated in the accompanying Memorandum, Defendant Dollar Tree Stores, Inc.’s Motion To Dismiss, Or In The Alternative, Transfer Plaintiff Denise Coleman (Docket No. 15) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part; and Plaintiff’s Plaintiff Denise Coleman’s Motion To Strike (Docket No. 26) is DENIED, as moot. The Clerk is directed to transfer the case of Denise Coleman to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee. It is so ORDERED. _______________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?