Harris v. A.D. Vallett & Co., LLC et al

Filing 41

ORDER: By Report and Recommendation entered March 10, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 39 ), the Court recommended that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 21 ) be granted. Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedu re and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provide that any objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within fourteen (14) days of being served with the Report and Recommendation, and must state with particularity the s pecific portions of the Report & Recommendation to which objection is made. Failure to file written objections within the specified time can be deemed a waiver of the right to appeal the District Court's order. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters, 638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981). It is so ORDERED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Juliet E. Griffin on 3/11/2014. (xc:Pro se party by regular and certified mail.)(DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
SETH D. HARRIS,
Acting Secretary of Labor, United States
Department of Labor
v.
A.D. VALLETT & CO., LLC; AARON
DONALD VALLETT; MEPHISTO
401(K) PROFIT SHARING PLAN;
WILEY GROUP, INC. 401(K) PROFIT
SHARING PLAN AND TRUST;
SOUTHEASTERN BUILDING
CORPORATION 401(K) PROFIT
SHARING PLAN AND TRUST;
TIMOTHY E. MCNUTT, SR. D.D.S.
401(K) PROFIT PLAN AND TRUST;
PROJECT C.A.M.P. 401(K) PROFIT
SHARING PLAN AND TRUST; and
HENRY E. HILDEBRAND, III

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

3-13-0105

ORDER
By Report and Recommendation entered March 10, 2014 (Docket Entry No. 39), the Court
recommended that the plaintiff's motion for summary judgment (Docket Entry No. 21) be granted.
Rule 72(b)(2) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) provide that
any objections to a Report and Recommendation must be filed with the Clerk of Court within
fourteen (14) days of being served with the Report and Recommendation, and must state with
particularity the specific portions of the Report & Recommendation to which objection is made.
Failure to file written objections within the specified time can be deemed a waiver of the right to
appeal the District Court's order. See Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140 (1985); United States v. Walters,
638 F.2d 947 (6th Cir. 1981).
It is so ORDERED.

JULIET GRIFFIN
United States Magistrate Judge1