Ponce v. Social Security Administration

Filing 44

ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS: The Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff's Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 11/10/2015. (eh)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TIFFANY BROOKE PONCE, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 3:13-cv-00129 Judge Nixon Magistrate Judge Bryant ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Tiffany Brooke Ponce’s Motion for Judgment on the Administrative Record (“Motion”) (Doc. No. 12), filed with a Brief in Support (Doc. No. 13). Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response opposing the Motion (Doc. No. 18) to which Plaintiff filed a Reply (Doc. No. 20). The parties filed multiple Sur-Reply briefs. (Doc. Nos. 23, 25, 33, 38, 41.) Subsequently, Magistrate Judge Bryant issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the Motion be denied. (Doc. No. 42 at 19.) The Report was filed on October 22, 2015, and provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id.) Neither party has filed an objection to date. Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby DENIES Plaintiff’s Motion and AFFIRMS the decision of the Commissioner. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. It is so ORDERED. Entered this the 9th day of November, 2014. ________________________________ JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?