Olson v. Olson

Filing 34

ORDER: Final pretrial conference was held on 5/13/13. For the reasons stated in open Court, it is hereby ORDERED that: Respondent's Motion in Limine for Children to Testify in Chambers 18 is hereby RESERVED for ruling at trial. Respondent 9;s Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony on Hungarian Law 19 is hereby DENIED. Respondent's Motion in Limine to Permit Witness Testimony by Telephone [or Skype] 20 is hereby GRANTED. Respondent's Motion in Limine Objecting to and to Strike Proposed Expert Witness Dr. John Ciocca 22 is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Respondent's Motion in Limine to Exclude Hungarian School Enrollment Records without Testimony of Custodian of Records 23 is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by District Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 5/15/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION SIMONA OANA OLSON, Petitioner, v. OLIVER WILLIAM OLSON, Respondent. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. 3:13-cv-0138 Judge Sharp ORDER A final pretrial conference was held in this matter on May 13, 2013. For the reasons stated in open Court, it is hereby ORDERED that: 1. Respondent’s Motion in Limine for Children to Testify in Chambers (Docket Entry No. 18) is hereby RESERVED for ruling at trial; 2. Respondent’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Expert Testimony on Hungarian Law (Docket Entry No. 19) is hereby DENIED; 3. Respondent’s Motion in Limine to Permit Witness Testimony by Telephone [or Skype] (Docket Entry No. 20) is hereby GRANTED; 4. Respondent’s Motion in Limine Objecting to and to Strike Proposed Expert Witness Dr. John Ciocca (Docket Entry No. 22) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT; and 5. Respondent’s Motion in Limine to Exclude Hungarian School Enrollment Records without Testimony of Custodian of Records (Docket Entry No. 23) is hereby DENIED AS MOOT. 1 It is so ORDERED. _________________________________________ KEVIN H. SHARP UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?