Cadence Bank, N.A. v. Barclay
Filing
10
ORDER: Counsel should file appropriate pleadings with the District Judge within 30 days setting out the necessary parameters of the resolution, which the Magistrate Judge understands may request the Court to retain jurisdiction of the case for a p eriod of time until the terms of the settlement can be completed. At the present time it does not appear that anything remains to be done by the Magistrate Judge and the Clerk is directed to forward the file to Judge Nixon for his consideration of further pleadings in the matter. Signed by Magistrate Judge Joe Brown on 6/10/13. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
CADENCE BANK, N.A.,
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiff
v.
MARC T. BARCLAY,
Defendant
No. 3:13-0143
Judge Nixon/Brown
O R D E R
At the initial case management conference counsel the
Defendant advised that the parties had reached a resolution in this
matter and, therefore, would not need an initial case management
order entered.
Counsel
should
file
appropriate
pleadings
with
the
District Judge within 30 days setting out the necessary parameters
of the resolution, which the Magistrate Judge understands may
request the Court to retain jurisdiction of the case for a period
of time until the terms of the settlement can be completed.
It is possible that in their pleadings the parties can
request that the Court administratively close the case for a set
period of time subject to being reopened for good cause shown in
the event the terms of the settlement are not consummated.
At the present time it does not appear that anything
remains to be done by the Magistrate Judge and the Clerk is
directed to forward the file to Judge Nixon for his consideration
of further pleadings in the matter.
It is so ORDERED.
/s/
Joe B. Brown
JOE B. BROWN
United States Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?