Arnold v. Social Security Administration

Filing 27

ORDER: Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the 25 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff's 14 Motion and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Signed by Senior Judge John T. Nixon on 10/14/2016. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(jw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION TRINYA ARNOLD, ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiff, v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. No. 3:13-cv-00197 Judge Nixon Magistrate Judge Frensley ORDER Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Trinya Arnold’s Motion for Judgment Based Upon the Administrative Record (“Motion”). (Doc. No. 14.) Defendant Commissioner of Social Security filed a Response opposing the Motion (Doc. No. 20), and Plaintiff replied (Doc. No. 23). Magistrate Judge Knowles issued a Report and Recommendation (“Report”) recommending that the present action be remanded for further consideration of the evidence in light of Plaintiff’s fibromyalgia. (Doc. No. 25 at 13.) The Report was filed on September 1, 2016, and provided a period of fourteen days in which either party could file an objection. (Id.) Neither party has filed an objection to date. Upon review of this matter, the Court finds the Report to be well-founded and ADOPTS it in its entirety. Accordingly, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s Motion and REMANDS this case to the Commissioner for further proceedings. The Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close the case. Entered this the 14th day of October, 2016. ________________________________ JOHN T. NIXON, SENIOR JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?