Koch v. Lightning Transportation, LLC et al
Filing
57
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 19 Motion for Summary Judgment. Signed by Chief Judge Kevin H. Sharp on 1/6/2015. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(hb)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE
NASHVILLE DIVISION
TIFFANY KOCH,
Plaintiff,
v.
LIGHTNING TRANSPORTATION,
LLC, EMPLOYEE SOLUTIONS,
LLC d/b/a LIGHTNING
TRANSPORTATION SERVICES,
and DONALD DENNING, JC.,
individually,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Civil No. 3:13-0225
Judge Sharp
Order
For the reasons set forth in the accompanying memorandum, Defendant’s Motion for
Summary Judgment as to Plaintiff’s Complaint (Docket No. 19) is hereby GRANTED in part
and DENIED in part as follows:
(1) With respect to Plaintiff’s intentional misrepresentation claim, the motion is
GRANTED.
(2) With respect to Plaintiff’s negligent misrepresentation claim, the motion is
GRANTED.
(3) With respect to Plaintiff’s pregnancy discrimination claim, the motion is DENIED.
(4) With respect to Plaintiff’s breach of contract claim, the motion is DENIED as to the
agreement to pay Plaintiff for six weeks of maternity leave and GRANTED as to the
agreement for Plaintiff to return to work at the conclusion of her maternity leave.
(5) With respect to Plaintiff’s promissory fraud claim, the motion is DENIED as to the
agreement to pay Plaintiff for six weeks of maternity leave and GRANTED as to the
agreement for Plaintiff to return to work at the conclusion of her maternity leave.
(6) With respect to Plaintiff’s promissory estoppel claim, the motion is DENIED as to the
agreement to pay Plaintiff for six weeks of maternity leave and GRANTED as to the
agreement for Plaintiff to return to work at the conclusion of her maternity leave.
It is SO ORDERED.
_________________________________________
KEVIN H. SHARP
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?