Mansfield v. The Home Depot, U.S.A., Inc.

Filing 50

ORDER: Jury Trial reset for 5/12/2015 at 9:00 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Pretrial Conference reset for 5/4/2015 at 10:30 AM before District Judge Todd J. Campbell. Exhibit List and Witness List due by 4/27/2015. Proposed Pretrial Order due by 4/27/2015. Signed by District Judge Todd J. Campbell on 5/27/14. (DOCKET TEXT SUMMARY ONLY-ATTORNEYS MUST OPEN THE PDF AND READ THE ORDER.)(dt)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF TENNESSEE NASHVILLE DIVISION JOSEPH F. MANSFIELD v. THE HOME DEPOT U.S.A., INC. ) ) ) ) ) NO. 3:13-0228 JUDGE CAMPBELL ORDER The Magistrate Judge’s Recommendation (Docket No. 48) recommends that the current trial date be continued. Accordingly, the jury trial currently set for October 21, 2014, is RESCHEDULED for May 12, 2015, beginning at 9:00 a.m. The Pretrial Conference currently set for October 10, 2014, is RESCHEDULED for May 4, 2015, at 10:30 a.m. All lawyers who will participate in the trial must attend the pretrial conference. Pretrial Filing Deadlines Counsel shall submit a Joint Proposed Pretrial Order to the Court by April 27, 2015. The Pretrial Order shall contain: (1) a recitation that the pleadings are amended to conform to the Pretrial Order and that the Pretrial Order supplants the pleadings; (2) a statement of the basis for jurisdiction in this Court; (3) a short summary of the Plaintiff's theory (no more than one page); (4) a short summary of the Defendant's theory (no more than one page); (5) a statement of the issues, including a designation of which issues are for the jury and which are for the Court; (6) a succinct statement of the relief sought; (7) a summary of any anticipated evidentiary disputes; and (8) an estimate of the anticipated length of the trial. The parties shall also submit to the Court, by April 27, 2015, the following: (1) joint proposed jury instructions and verdict forms as follows: Counsel shall exchange proposed jury instructions on the substantive law of this specific case and proposed verdict forms and confer to reach agreement. Thereafter, counsel shall jointly prepare and file a set of agreed, proposed, case specific, jury instructions and verdict forms. Each proposed jury instruction shall include citations to supporting authorities. Counsel shall separately file any disputed jury instructions or verdict forms. (2) witness lists, except for witnesses solely for impeachment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3); (3) exhibit lists, except for documents solely for impeachment in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(3); and (4) any stipulations. Motions in Limine and Objections to Experts By April 20, 2015, the parties shall file any motions in limine and any motions objecting to expert testimony. Any responses to such motions shall be filed by April 27, 2015. Discovery Expert witness disclosures shall be made timely, in accordance with Local Rule 39.01(c)(6)d. Supplemental responses to interrogatories, requests for production and requests for admissions shall be made timely in accordance with Local Rules 33.01(c), 34.01 and 36.01. Objections to the use of a deposition at trial shall be made timely in accordance with Local Rules 32.01(b) and 39.01(d)(1).The Court may exclude evidence, or order other sanctions, for violation of a duty or deadline to make or supplement expert witness disclosures or discovery responses. 2 Pretrial Conference Counsel shall be prepared, at the Pretrial Conference, to: (1) identify and discuss undisputed facts and issues; (2) discuss the status of discovery; (3) preview proposed testimony; (4) discuss expert testimony; (5) preview proposed exhibits; (6) discuss motions in limine; (7) discuss proposed jury instructions and verdict forms; (8) discuss settlement; and (9) discuss pretrial briefs. IT IS SO ORDERED. ______________________________ TODD J. CAMPBELL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?